Compare
Compare online casinos on one table: licence, rails, limit and score
Gama caps a payout at EUR 185 a day at its entry level while Stake sets no maximum on crypto, and that gap runs down the last column here, beside the average out of ten, the regulator, the founding year, the code, BLIK, zloty and crypto for every brand with a partner deal. To compare online casinos by rail or currency, filter with the chips, sort by reading down the limit column, and open the review for the rest.

The comparison table
The first column stays put while you scroll sideways on a phone. A limit that reads not published means exactly that; a code button copies the code.
| Casino | Score | Licence | Since | No deposit | BLIK | PLN | Crypto | Withdrawal limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1xSlots Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2017 | 100 free spins | no | no | yes | No Limits | |
| Play Fortuna Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2013 | 100 free spins | no | yes | yes | EUR 10,000 a day at base status, rising to EUR 45,000 at diamond (PLN 40,000 to PLN 180,000); no cap on winnings | |
| Stake Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2017 | no | no | no | yes | not published | |
| Vavada Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2017 | 100 free spins | yes | yes | yes | USD 1,000 per day, USD 10,000 per month | |
| Vodka Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 50 free spins | no | no | yes | EUR 10,000 a month, or EUR 5,000 if the balance is 10x deposits; 8% fee on an unwagered deposit | |
| Riobet Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2014 | 70 free spins | no | no | yes | Minimum 25 USD. Base ceiling EUR 1,000 a day and EUR 5,000 a month, raised at VIP levels to EUR 10,000 a day | |
| Spinbetter Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2019 | 100 free spins | yes | yes | yes | 1,500 EUR per day | |
| Bitstarz Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2014 | 20 free spins on registration | no | no | yes | EUR 4,000 to EUR 50,000 per transaction, by method | |
| Booi Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2019 | 100 free spins | yes | yes | yes | not published | |
| Daddy Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 100 free spins | no | no | no | EUR 4,000 a day and EUR 40,000 a month at base level, rising to EUR 50,000 a day | |
| Cactus Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2024 | 100 free spins | no | yes | yes | EUR 3,000 per day, EUR 30,000 per month at base tier | |
| Cat Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2021 | 100 free spins | no | no | yes | not published | |
| 1Win Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2016 | no | no | yes | yes | No Limits | |
| Weiss Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 15 WEFT | no | no | yes | EUR 4,000 per week | |
| BC Game Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2017 | no | no | yes | yes | not published | |
| Gama Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 100 free spins | no | no | no | EUR 185 a day at the entry VIP level, rising to EUR 30,000 a day at the top; no cap on winnings | |
| Winz Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2020 | no | no | no | yes | About USD 10,000 per crypto transaction and USD 400,000 a month; about EUR 4,000 per fiat transaction | |
| Fairspin Casino | Anjouan (AGA) | 2018 | no | no | no | yes | not published | |
| Casino-X Casino | Curacao (CGA) | 2011 | no | no | no | yes | not published | |
| Auf Casino | not scored | Anjouan (AGA) | 2024 | 100 free spins | no | no | yes | not published |
| Betico Casino | not scored | Curacao (CGA) | 2025 | no | no | no | yes | not published |
| Cryptoboss Casino | not scored | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 100 free spins | no | no | no | not published |
| Duel Casino | not scored | Anjouan (AGA) | 2025 | no | no | no | yes | not published |
| Unlim Casino | not scored | Anjouan (AGA) | 2023 | 100 free spins | no | no | yes | EUR 10,000 per month; no cap on the size of a win |
Reading the table
What each column means
| Casino | the brand name, linked to its review; the button on the review opens the casino |
|---|---|
| Score | plain average of trust, games, bonus terms and support, out of ten |
| Licence | the regulator named in the footer, checked on its public register during the review |
| Since | the founding year in our data, from the footer, the licence issue date and reviews |
| No deposit | the code on the owner's list and what it gives; no means the brand runs none |
| BLIK | the rail appears in the deposit list; it is deposit only everywhere |
| PLN | a zloty balance exists in the account currency list |
| Crypto | a Bitcoin, Tether or Ethereum balance exists |
| Withdrawal limit | the ceiling copied from the terms, base tier; not published means the terms give no figure |
Two columns need a caveat. The licence column prints the regulator, not a verdict: a Curacao Gaming Authority entry can read active, indefinite or assessment in progress on the register, and an Anjouan number can be valid while a previous Curacao number for the same brand reads revoked, as at Vodka and Auf. The review carries the register status; the table carries the name.
The BLIK column is a yes only where the rail is in the data, and even then two brands carry a caution in their reviews: Play Fortuna's own payment list omits BLIK while an aggregator includes it, and a Polish review of Cactus says the rail is absent. A yes in this column is a reason to open the cashier, not a promise.
The code column copies the code with one tap. The amount beside it is the spins or cash the code gives; the wagering and the cashout cap are on the bonus page, and both matter more than the amount.
The order of reading
Why the withdrawal limit is the column to read first
Every other column describes what a brand lets in. The limit column describes what it lets out, and it is where the brands on this table differ most. At one end Stake publishes no maximum on a crypto withdrawal and 1xSlots and 1Win are recorded with unlimited payouts; at the other Vavada caps a day at USD 1,000 and a month at USD 10,000, Spinbetter a day at EUR 1,500, Riobet a day at EUR 1,000 and a month at EUR 5,000 at base, and Gama opens at EUR 185 a day at its entry level. A score of 9.5 and a score of 9.0 sit on both sides of that gap.
Read the limit against the bonus. A code worth 100 free spins is the same at a brand with a EUR 4,000 daily ceiling and one with a USD 1,000 ceiling; a welcome match up to USD 1,000 is not, because a win on it leaves in one request at the first brand and over a month at the second. Then read it against the rail: Bitstarz caps every bank route at EUR 4,000 per transaction and crypto at EUR 50,000, so the same account has two ceilings depending on the column to its left.
And read not published as not published. Where the table prints no limit, the terms give none or the sources disagree, and the review says which. Booi is quoted at USD 10,000 a day by one source, USD 3,000 by another and as a VIP ladder by the brand itself; Cat is quoted at EUR 5,000 a month by one source and a tiered EUR 4,000 a day by another. That cell is a question for the chat before the first deposit, and the support mark on the review says how quickly the chat answers.
The order we read a row in
Limit first, then licence, then the rails you use, then the code. The score is the summary of the four marks, and the table exists so you do not have to take the summary on trust.
Sort by the ceilingPublished payout timesEvery code with its terms
Quick answers
Why does the table show no withdrawal limit for some casinos
Because the brand publishes none in its terms or the sources we hold disagree, and printing a single figure would be a guess. Stake states no maximum on crypto, Booi is quoted three different ways, Cat two. The review of each brand names every source; the table prints only what the terms say.
What does the score column mean
The plain average of four marks: trust, games, bonus terms and support. Each review shows the four separately so you can see which mark carried the number. A brand with no score is one we have reviewed but not yet marked, usually because the lobby could not be opened from a European address.
Can I filter the table for Polish players
Tap BLIK, Zloty account or Polish interface above the table and the rows that lack the tag disappear. The three together are the shortest test of whether a brand is built for Poland. The Poland hub does the same with the law and the rails explained alongside.
Why are some brands from the reviews missing from the table
The Royal Partners family is reviewed in full and kept out of every ranking and comparison by an editorial decision, and the brands with no partner deal are reviewed but not compared, because their button opens a different casino. Both groups are linked from the casino reviews hub.


